|
|
Papers On Julius Caesar
Page 1 of 4
|
|
"Julius Caesar" Today
[ send me this paper ]
This 3 page paper considers how critics might look at Caesar and today's societal issues. Bibliography lists 3 sources
Filename: HVJCTody.rtf
Analysis of William Shakespeare’s “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”
[ send me this paper ]
A 7 page paper which examines whether or not the play is historically accurate. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Filename: TGjulcae.rtf
Brutus and Elisha
[ send me this paper ]
A 4 page paper which compares the character of Brutus, in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar with Elisha in Elie Wiesel’s Dawn. No additional sources cited.
Filename: RAjws.rtf
Brutus in William Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar”
[ send me this paper ]
A 6 page paper which contends that Brutus is the play’s tragic hero. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Filename: TGbrutus.rtf
Calpurnia and Portia in William Shakespeare’s “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”
[ send me this paper ]
A 2.5 page paper which compares and contrasts the two lone female characters in Shakespeare’s tragedy, in terms of the love and loyalty they show to their husbands. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Filename: TGcalpor.rtf
Comparative Analysis of Characters Mark Antony and Caius Cassius in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar
[ send me this paper ]
In five pages this paper contrasts and compares the characters Mark Antony and Caius Cassius as depicted in William Shakespeare’s tragic historical play Julius Caesar. Three sources are listed in the bibliography.
Filename: TGantcass.rtf
Comparison of the Speech of Brutus and Antony in Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar”
[ send me this paper ]
This is a 5 page paper comparing the speech styles used by Brutus and Antony and the purpose of those styles in Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar”. Brutus and Antony present quite different speech styles which reveal a great deal about their characters in the William Shakespeare’s tragedy “Julius Caesar”. Brutus is an honest man who is loyal to the government of Rome. He truly believes that by killing Caesar and his ambitions that it will lead to the betterment of Rome. His speeches reflect this honesty but also in many ways his naivety as he believes those around him are also sincere in their dedication to Rome for their purpose for killing Caesar. Brutus does not take bribes and throughout believes in the sincerity of those around him which eventually causes him and the conspirators to become accused by Antony at the funeral of Caesar. Brutus’ speech is direct, more formal and honest which reflects the man himself. Antony on the other hand, is loyal to Caesar, but is much more skillful in his speech which allows him to “trap” those around him to say what he wants them to say. This in turn reflects his personality as Antony, although loyal to Caesar, has ambitions of his own and his speech and his actions take upon a leadership role after Caesar’s death. Antony manipulates his speech to accommodate those around him allowing others to come to the conclusion he is trying to make without being as direct as the honest and naďve Brutus. Antony is much more cunning in his speech which reflects his nature as a cunning, ambitious and intelligent character in the play.
Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Filename: TJBrutu1.rtf
|
